History of the WolvHaven Server: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 441: Line 441:
==== Five Active Warnings ====
==== Five Active Warnings ====
Delfino88 was previously warned for large scale worldediting in Gardellia which was referred to as “deswamping” by the community and repeated trespass into restricted areas within WolvHaven. The final warning came on the 1st April 2018 for lying to staff bringing the total number of active warnings to three, resulting in a ban of a week.
Delfino88 was previously warned for large scale worldediting in Gardellia which was referred to as “deswamping” by the community and repeated trespass into restricted areas within WolvHaven. The final warning came on the 1st April 2018 for lying to staff bringing the total number of active warnings to three, resulting in a ban of a week.
An additional two warnings came in later on 2 April 2018 after he failed to remove builds which he copied without permission from Tony515 by burying the building underneath instead of removing it as required. This was part of the new plagiarism act of 2018 which was passed and signed in parliament on the 24 March 2018 which gave all members a week’s grace period to remove all builds which were copied without permission from the author.
An additional two warnings came in later on 2 April 2018 after he failed to remove builds which he copied without permission from Tony515 by burying the building underneath instead of removing it as required. This was part of the new plagiarism act of 2018 which was passed and signed in parliament on the 24 March 2018 which gave all members a week’s grace period to remove all builds which were copied without permission from the author.


Line 683: Line 681:


I am shocked at the fact that no one has been realizing how serious of an issue this is that someone had to leave based on not feeling safe within the community, and that no one brought the issue up after he left. Even though it was an election season and criticism and debating was quite common, some of the things said towards Auto were not acceptable by any standards. There are many instances of ad hominem attacks against him as a person rather than the policy that he was drafting. These ad hominem attacks aimed to paint him as a liar and manipulator who tricks members of other opposition parties into serving his own gain. By far the worst that happened was when he was mocked for the way he typed and edited his messages, with someone joking “Guys lets have a message editing challenge! Most edited messages over the whole campaign wins!!”, even though it was clearly intended for people to edit old messages instead of spamming new ones to keep the chat clean. It was one of the most disgraceful things that could have happened to anyone and if this was in a school this would be considered cyberbullying. I firmly asked the people who were attacking Auto to reflect on for a minute, and to see what they have been doing and to think to themselves if what they were doing was acceptable behaviour, but when they responded all they showed me was that they did not care about how they acted towards others. When Auto was called a liar, I asked them if how would they feel to be called a liar, and one responded “I would be honored to be called a lair as lairs are pretty cool”, and when I told the person who made the editing joke that it wasn’t funny and insulting he said “oh noes HGP doesn’t like les jokes”. Calling someone a liar is not a joke, it is a serious accusation meant to attack the person directly in order to degrade them; so to are the comments made on how Auto edits his messages, but they didn't treat them as serious issues, but as so called harmless jokes that ended up causing some of the greatest emotional harm to not just Auto, but to me as well. Every time I saw a comment that was attacking Auto, I felt as if I was being attacked as well, and eventually it got to the point where we were both crying in a call with each other. I felt the pain he felt, it was as if society thought he was a punching bag, something that could be hit over and over and over again without facing any concequences. Despite the guilt he had of leaving me and the rest of the Wolvhaven community behind, the toxicity on the server was too much for him, and it was only one of many times that he was driven off the server due to toxicity, with one time him contemplating suicide. It is not easy to describe what happened that night, but all I can say is that in that conversation flowed a river of tears. After the emotional conversation, Auto resigned from the HGP and left Wolvhaven indefinitley. To me this was a big deal as I had just lost a friend from the server where I met him, and the fact that the server had lost a player who contributed a lot to its development. What I was shocked to see was that there was no mass outrage over what happened, and what was even worse was the so called thank you letter from those who attacked Auto. It said <blockquote>“Thank you for your long service as a politician. We respect the difficult decision you had to make, and not many people are able to value their personal, in real life needs over a video game. While our parties may not have agreed on everything, it was clear that you had a passion and drive to work for the benefit of all WolvHaveners. Once again, thank you for your service and good luck on future endeavors”</blockquote>I thought this thank you letter for everything that Auto had done was completely insincere even more of an insult to him than it was a complement. Auto did not leave because of real life issues out of his control, he left because the community was not a safe place for him to be in anymore out of fear of harassment. They stated that he had a drive to work for the benefit of all Wolvhaveners while constantly questioning him during the debate about his activity, and that if he was really dedicated to the server. There was no apology in the letter expressing how they treated him was wrong, all they did was say “we are ‘sorry’ to be seeing you leave” in order to cover up what they really did; harass Auto to the point where he left the server just because he disagreed with them. They harassed him so much that a few days later Auto said that he was less stressed and happier overall after he left in a conversation with me.  
I am shocked at the fact that no one has been realizing how serious of an issue this is that someone had to leave based on not feeling safe within the community, and that no one brought the issue up after he left. Even though it was an election season and criticism and debating was quite common, some of the things said towards Auto were not acceptable by any standards. There are many instances of ad hominem attacks against him as a person rather than the policy that he was drafting. These ad hominem attacks aimed to paint him as a liar and manipulator who tricks members of other opposition parties into serving his own gain. By far the worst that happened was when he was mocked for the way he typed and edited his messages, with someone joking “Guys lets have a message editing challenge! Most edited messages over the whole campaign wins!!”, even though it was clearly intended for people to edit old messages instead of spamming new ones to keep the chat clean. It was one of the most disgraceful things that could have happened to anyone and if this was in a school this would be considered cyberbullying. I firmly asked the people who were attacking Auto to reflect on for a minute, and to see what they have been doing and to think to themselves if what they were doing was acceptable behaviour, but when they responded all they showed me was that they did not care about how they acted towards others. When Auto was called a liar, I asked them if how would they feel to be called a liar, and one responded “I would be honored to be called a lair as lairs are pretty cool”, and when I told the person who made the editing joke that it wasn’t funny and insulting he said “oh noes HGP doesn’t like les jokes”. Calling someone a liar is not a joke, it is a serious accusation meant to attack the person directly in order to degrade them; so to are the comments made on how Auto edits his messages, but they didn't treat them as serious issues, but as so called harmless jokes that ended up causing some of the greatest emotional harm to not just Auto, but to me as well. Every time I saw a comment that was attacking Auto, I felt as if I was being attacked as well, and eventually it got to the point where we were both crying in a call with each other. I felt the pain he felt, it was as if society thought he was a punching bag, something that could be hit over and over and over again without facing any concequences. Despite the guilt he had of leaving me and the rest of the Wolvhaven community behind, the toxicity on the server was too much for him, and it was only one of many times that he was driven off the server due to toxicity, with one time him contemplating suicide. It is not easy to describe what happened that night, but all I can say is that in that conversation flowed a river of tears. After the emotional conversation, Auto resigned from the HGP and left Wolvhaven indefinitley. To me this was a big deal as I had just lost a friend from the server where I met him, and the fact that the server had lost a player who contributed a lot to its development. What I was shocked to see was that there was no mass outrage over what happened, and what was even worse was the so called thank you letter from those who attacked Auto. It said <blockquote>“Thank you for your long service as a politician. We respect the difficult decision you had to make, and not many people are able to value their personal, in real life needs over a video game. While our parties may not have agreed on everything, it was clear that you had a passion and drive to work for the benefit of all WolvHaveners. Once again, thank you for your service and good luck on future endeavors”</blockquote>I thought this thank you letter for everything that Auto had done was completely insincere even more of an insult to him than it was a complement. Auto did not leave because of real life issues out of his control, he left because the community was not a safe place for him to be in anymore out of fear of harassment. They stated that he had a drive to work for the benefit of all Wolvhaveners while constantly questioning him during the debate about his activity, and that if he was really dedicated to the server. There was no apology in the letter expressing how they treated him was wrong, all they did was say “we are ‘sorry’ to be seeing you leave” in order to cover up what they really did; harass Auto to the point where he left the server just because he disagreed with them. They harassed him so much that a few days later Auto said that he was less stressed and happier overall after he left in a conversation with me.  


To all those reading, you might ask why didn’t I speak up about this issue before, well that's because I was afraid, afraid of that I was to become the next target of harassment. All of us in the HGP were afraid, too afraid to tell the truth. One person did actually say what happened was wrong. He said “... Congrats… you’ve bullied Auto into quitting”. We unfortunately had to lie that he did not quit because of bullying in fear that we would cause another fight. We all were stressed out and tired from campaigning and didn’t want another one. During the live covering of the results we tried to bring up the issue of Auto’s departure from the server after Newsnet didn’t bring it up on their own, but that never caught wind.  
To all those reading, you might ask why didn’t I speak up about this issue before, well that's because I was afraid, afraid of that I was to become the next target of harassment. All of us in the HGP were afraid, too afraid to tell the truth. One person did actually say what happened was wrong. He said “... Congrats… you’ve bullied Auto into quitting”. We unfortunately had to lie that he did not quit because of bullying in fear that we would cause another fight. We all were stressed out and tired from campaigning and didn’t want another one. During the live covering of the results we tried to bring up the issue of Auto’s departure from the server after Newsnet didn’t bring it up on their own, but that never caught wind.  
Line 705: Line 704:
|}
|}


==== United WolvHaven disbands (November?) ====
==== United WolvHaven disbands ====
''Main Article: [[United WolvHaven]]''
''Main Article: [[United WolvHaven]]''
On November 12th 2020, {{Parties/UWH}} leader and [[CM Raiders|Prime Minister CM_Raiders]] announced that they would be disbanding following the end of the term of the [[Parliament of WolvHaven/13th|13th Parliament of WolvHaven]].
''The following is the statement from the Prime Minister and the letter of cessation of activities provided by the {{Parties/UWH}}'' ''party.''
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible"
|+
!{{Parties/UWH}} Cessation of Activities Letter
!Statement by [[CM_Raiders]]
|-
|To the community of Wolvhaven, We humbly thank you for your ongoing support in parliament over these past years. From our beginnings as the National Conservative Party, Party for Gardellia or the Centre, to our progression as Forward WolvHaven, to our final form as United WolvHaven, we have been humbled by your ongoing support. It is now, with our deepest regrets, we inform you of our exit from formal WolvHaven politics. In our time in parliament, we have had our ups and our downs but we have enjoyed almost every moment of it.
Despite our best efforts, we have recently seen a drop off in the ability to continue serving the community. Many of our members are entering their final years of education, and as a result, have constantly decreasing time to keep up with the server. As a result, it is in the best interests of both the party and the server to withdraw from parliament. It is no point having a party whose members are not active members of the server have an active say in how the server is governed.
In addition to this, the referendum that approaches concerning the future of WolvHaven’s parliamentary system will soon be voted on, where some major accompanying changes are expected to come into effect, such as Staff not being able to run in the HoR, of which a large portion of this party and its current executive are apart of. This is even more reason for our withdrawal.
This is not, however, the end of the road for United WolvHaven. While the party itself is ceasing to run in elections, this may not be the case for some of our members. We ask that you redirect your support to our past members as they are more than capable of representing you, come what may.
While we may no longer be “excited to announce that we are excited,” we are still grateful for the opportunity that has been presented to us. For the last time, from the United WolvHaven team (and Alan), thank you. It has been a great honour!
Resigning once again on behalf of United WolvHaven,
Ezzo
Signed,
CM_Raiders, Prime Minister,
Baymax1020, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister for Finance, Trade and the Economy,
CaptainSlow_, Minister for Infrastructure and National Development,
Grass_Jelly, Minister for Home Affairs,
Hinwapoon, Leader of the House,
MatthieuTofu, Minister for Education and Culture,
_Aezo, Chief Minister of Gardellia,
Minebuilder1223, Minister for Foreign Affairs,
VincentLUMCFan, Member of Parliament,
Kangaroo567, Former MP,
Tony515, Former MP,
boomdoom_, Secretary,
Cupochan_,
_somtinwong,
TurboChan
|
As a result, this has been my one and only term as Prime Minister. I must certainly say that it has been a wonderful time serving and while my real life commitments have gradually rendered my activity both in parliament and in WolvHaven to decrease, I sincerely wish the HoR and its future good luck in its future endeavours!
I think there's probably more I could say but for now I'd just like to thank everyone in UWH, formerly associated with UWH and all MPs, no matter what party you are associated with. And a big thank you to the parliament service people as well. But most of all thank you to the community that supported UWH throughout its history in WolvHaven! lol im bad at writing speeches
|}
[[File:2020PoliticalReforms1.png|thumb|416x416px|Infographic presenting the proposed [[November 2020 WolvHaven Political Reforms]]]]
[[File:2020PoliticalReforms1.png|thumb|416x416px|Infographic presenting the proposed [[November 2020 WolvHaven Political Reforms]]]]


Line 739: Line 804:


WolvHaveners voted in favour of the newly proposed direct-elect ministerial positions whilst continuing to favour general [[Parliament of WolvHaven/List of Members|Members of Parliament]] who would be lected under the Single Transferrable Vote system.
WolvHaveners voted in favour of the newly proposed direct-elect ministerial positions whilst continuing to favour general [[Parliament of WolvHaven/List of Members|Members of Parliament]] who would be lected under the Single Transferrable Vote system.
 
{| class="wikitable" width="100%"
!Question!!% of vote for Option 1!!Number of vote for Option 1!!% of vote for Option 2!! Number of vote for Option 2!!Preferred Option
|-
|1. Do you support direct-elect ministerial positions (DEP)?
Option 1 - Yes
Option 2 - No||{{PercentBar|75|75.00%}}||{{PercentBar|75|36/48}}||{{PercentBar|25|25.00%}}||{{PercentBar|25|12/48}}||YES
|-
|2. Under a direct-elect ministerial position system, do you want general Members of Parliament (MPs)?
Option 1 - Yes
Option 2 - No||{{PercentBar|66.67|66.67%}}||{{PercentBar|66.67|32/48}}||{{PercentBar|33.33|33.33%}}||{{PercentBar|33.33|16/48}}|| YES
|-
| 3. If there are general Members of Parliament, how should they be elected?
Option 1 - Using Single Transferrable Vote (STV)
Option 2 - using Party-List Proportionate system (PLP)||{{PercentBar|68.75|68.75%}}||{{PercentBar|68.75|33/48}}||{{PercentBar|31.25|31.25%}}||{{PercentBar|31.25|15/48}}|| STV
|}
=== WolvHaveners decide on Permanent Residency rank implementation ===
=== WolvHaveners decide on Permanent Residency rank implementation ===
''Main Article: [[2020 Referendum on Permanent Residency (PR) Implementation]]''
''Main Article: [[2020 Referendum on Permanent Residency (PR) Implementation]]''
Line 775: Line 854:


Following the [[2020 Referendum on Permanent Residency (PR) Implementation|referendum]]'s result, Visitors promoted from January 15th were promoted to the [[Ranks|PR rank]] rather than being promoted to the citizen rank. This was done on a temporary basis until [[Parliament of WolvHaven|Parliament]] confirmed the measures decided upon in the [[2020 Referendum on Permanent Residency (PR) Implementation|referendum]]. The first [[Ranks|PRs]] would only be promoted to the [[Ranks|citizen]] rank from March of the same year when the [[Ranks|Citizen]] application process was finalised.
Following the [[2020 Referendum on Permanent Residency (PR) Implementation|referendum]]'s result, Visitors promoted from January 15th were promoted to the [[Ranks|PR rank]] rather than being promoted to the citizen rank. This was done on a temporary basis until [[Parliament of WolvHaven|Parliament]] confirmed the measures decided upon in the [[2020 Referendum on Permanent Residency (PR) Implementation|referendum]]. The first [[Ranks|PRs]] would only be promoted to the [[Ranks|citizen]] rank from March of the same year when the [[Ranks|Citizen]] application process was finalised.
[[File:Newsnet6.png|thumb|[[User:MatthieuTofu|MatthieuTofu]] and [[User:CM Raiders|CM_Raiders]] became [[NewsNet WH|newsnet]]'s main presenting duo from March 2020 and were joined at the anchor desk in September by [[User:Perfecttrains|Perfecttrains]].]]
{| class="wikitable" width="100%"
!Question!!% of vote for Option A!!Number of vote for Option A !!% of vote for Option B!!Number of vote for Option B!!Preferred Option
|-
|1. Should the PR rank be introduced?
Option A - Yes
Option B - No||{{PercentBar|62.8|62.8%}}||{{PercentBar|62.8|49/78}}||{{PercentBar|35.9|35.9%}}||{{PercentBar|35.9|28/78}}||A
|-
|2. How should it be implemented?
Option A - Current Citizens shall not be demoted to PR rank
Option B - Citizens who have committed serious crimes or who have a large number of previous offenses shall be demoted to PR rank||{{PercentBar|46.1|46.1%}}||{{PercentBar|46.1|36/78}}||{{PercentBar|53.8|53.8%}}||{{PercentBar|53.8|42/78}}||B
|-
|3. What should be the criteria for promotion to PR?
Option A - Remove the need for an introductory letter and allow PRs with 1 warning to be promoted
Option B - No changes to the provisions of the Permanent Residency Act, 2018||{{PercentBar|67.9|67.9%}}||{{PercentBar|67.9|53/78}}||{{PercentBar|35.9|35.9%}}||{{PercentBar|35.9|25/78}}||A
|-
|4. What should be the criteria for demotion to PR?
Option A - Allow for inactive citizens to be demoted to PR rank
Option B - No changes to the provisions of the Permanent Residency Act, 2018 ||{{PercentBar|28.2|28.2%}}||{{PercentBar|28.2|22/78}}||{{PercentBar|71.8|71.8%}}||{{PercentBar|71.8|56/78}}||B
|-
|5. What should the rights and privileges be for PR?
Option A - Provide PRs with the same rights and privileges as citizens, except the right to participation in parliament and vote at elections
Option B - No changes to the provisions of the Permanent Residency Act, 2018||{{PercentBar|64.1|64.1%}}||{{PercentBar|64.1|50/78}}||{{PercentBar|35.9|35.9%}}||{{PercentBar|35.9|28/78}}||A
|}[[File:Newsnet6.png|thumb|[[User:MatthieuTofu|MatthieuTofu]] and [[User:CM Raiders|CM_Raiders]] became [[NewsNet WH|newsnet]]'s main presenting duo from March 2020 and were joined at the anchor desk in September by [[User:Perfecttrains|Perfecttrains]].]]


=== TPA for all ===
=== TPA for all ===
Line 891: Line 992:


==== August 2021 By-Election: the first and last By-Election ====
==== August 2021 By-Election: the first and last By-Election ====
[[File:Aug2021MINDByElectionExitPoll.png|thumb|[[NewsNet WH|newsnet]]'s exit poll released at 4pm UTC following the closing of polling stations.]]
''Main Article: [[By-election of WolvHaven, August 2021]]''
''Main Article: [[By-election of WolvHaven, August 2021]]''
The August 2021 by-election was held between August 27th 2021 and August 29th 2021 to elect a new [[Ministry for Infrastructure and National Development|Minister for Infrastructure and National Development]] as the seat was rendered vacant by the resignation of incumbent minister [[YoshiBoyAdvance]] on August 11th 2021, only a month into the term of the [[Parliament of WolvHaven/15th|15th Parliament of WolvHaven]]. It was the first ever by-election held after the [[November 2020 WolvHaven Political Reforms|November 2020 reforms]] and whole of WolvHaven history.
Turnout dropped from the [[General Election of WolvHaven, July 2021|July 2021 General Election]], with only 33 WolvHaveners casting their ballots.
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Party!!Candidate!!Final Count %!! Final Count!!Elected
|-
|{{Parties/IP}}||Heiopeii||{{PercentBar|90.91|90.91%}}||{{PercentBar|90.91|30/33}}||'''ELECTED'''
|-
|{{Parties/IP}}||LittleDragon2187 ||{{PercentBar|9.09|9.09%}}||{{PercentBar|9.09|3/33}}||
|-
| -|| Spoiled Votes|| -||{{PercentBar|0|0/33}}||
|}
==== Indefinite suspension of the House of Representatives ====
Following a period of unprecedented low parliamentary and server activity during the term of the [[Parliament of WolvHaven/15th|15th Parliament of WolvHaven]], no general election was called to elect House of Representative MPs for the [[Parliament of WolvHaven/16th|16th Parliament of WolvHaven]]. In effect, this resulted in the indefinite suspension of the [[House of Representatives of WolvHaven|House of Representatives]] since December 18th 2021, the last parliamentary session of the [[Parliament of WolvHaven/15th|15th Parliament of WolvHaven]].


=== Perfect Trains with a dash of Rickroll (1 Apr) ===
=== Perfect Trains with a dash of Rickroll (1 Apr) ===
Line 901: Line 1,019:


In line with the routine maintenance and renewal of the [[Metro+]] ticketing system, [[Metro+]] B-Series cards were phased out from March 3rd and were completely replaced by C-Series cards from April 6th.
In line with the routine maintenance and renewal of the [[Metro+]] ticketing system, [[Metro+]] B-Series cards were phased out from March 3rd and were completely replaced by C-Series cards from April 6th.
[[File:History New Wiki Poster.png|thumb|A poster promoting the launch of the new WolvHaven wiki]]


=== New wiki launched (June) ===
=== New wiki launched ===
Following the return of the server to Singapore on a dedicated machine owned and maintained by the WolvHaven server itself in June 2020, a new self-hosted server wiki was launched in June 2021.


=== [VIP] rank phased out, [PS] tag introduced (June) ===
This followed numerous complaints by server members which were heard and expressed by server leadership too regarding the previous Shoutwiki service. The outsourced wiki was plagued by numerous disruptions out of the control of staff.
 
=== [VIP] rank phased out, [PS] tag introduced ===
''Main Article: [[Ranks]]''
''Main Article: [[Ranks]]''
On June 3rd 2021, [[SilverWolv|President SilverWolv]] announced changes to the server's rank system.
The [VIP] rank was retired from the server complately following careful consideration and consultation, with all past members with the rank being demoted back to [Citizen]. The President noted that while the rank was meant to reward and recognise players who frequently patronised the server in the past, that it was time to recognise that the rank no longer served its purpose, neither did it represent the current community. He added that whilst most of the community wanted a clear-cut well defined criteria for the VIP rank should it be reintroduced, as rewarding it was previously subjective and prone to unintended bias, it was too challenging to come up with a new criteria, thus the rank would be discontinued altogether.
In tandem, a Public Servant [PS] tag, was introduced to give more recognition to non-staffers who help keep the server running. Public Servants are members on the server who either have limited enforcement powers or members who commonly work with or assist staff in server operations such as [[Train Driving|Train Examiners]] under [[Ministry for Infrastructure and National Development|MIND]], Wiki Curators under [[Ministry for Culture and Foreign Affairs|MCFA]], and members of the [[Parliament of WolvHaven|Parliamentary Service]].


=== Pride 2021 ===
=== Pride 2021 ===
''Main Article: [[WolvHaven Pride]]''
''Main Article: [[WolvHaven Pride]]''
 
[[File:Pride21 float9.jpg|thumb|One of the many floats participating in the Pride 2021 procession]]
The 2021 edition of the parade was held on 26 June 2021, 2PM UTC, mainly organised by [[User:Littledoggy2|Littledoggy2]] and [[User:CrazySharkGaming|CrazySharkGaming]], held in the same location as the parade in 2020. Along with the parade came several infrastructure improvements, such as the removal of the original stage that was built in 2020. The stage was replaced with a smaller, more permanent structure by [[National Solutions (NS)|National Solutions Group]] which would be used for all future events held at the same venue in the future. The updated stage was smaller, but fit in with the rest of the world better in terms of scale.
The 2021 edition of the parade was held on 26 June 2021, 2PM UTC, mainly organised by [[User:Littledoggy2|Littledoggy2]] and [[User:CrazySharkGaming|CrazySharkGaming]], held in the same location as the parade in 2020. Along with the parade came several infrastructure improvements, such as the removal of the original stage that was built in 2020. The stage was replaced with a smaller, more permanent structure by [[National Solutions (NS)|National Solutions Group]] which would be used for all future events held at the same venue in the future. The updated stage was smaller, but fit in with the rest of the world better in terms of scale.


Line 916: Line 1,044:
Players were treated to games such as Splegg, Paintball, and MobArena - a new addition to WolvHaven's events. However, due to unforseen technical difficulties, many did not play splegg.
Players were treated to games such as Splegg, Paintball, and MobArena - a new addition to WolvHaven's events. However, due to unforseen technical difficulties, many did not play splegg.


A Float design competition was also announced in the 2021 edition, and 18 floats were contributed by the community.\
A Float design competition was also announced in the 2021 edition, and 18 floats were contributed by the community.


[Embed YT Video (Pride Crossing — WolvHaven Pride 2021)]
[Embed YT Video (Pride Crossing — WolvHaven Pride 2021)]


=== Server rules simplified (July) ===
=== Server rules simplified (July) ===
[Embed YT Video (Presentation: Major changes to the server rules you need to know)]


=== Vision 2023 announced (October) ===
=== Vision 2023 announced ===
''Main Article: [[Vision 2023]]''
''Main Article: [[Vision 2023]]''
'''Vision 2023''', a strategic framework to shift the WolvHaven server from a mixed survival-roleplay creative server to a creative-focused server, was announced on October 27th 2021 with an aim for completion by 2023. Key goals included reducing the complexity of the server experience, and further accelerated development of WolvHaven City's fifth iteration - New Wolfminster. Vision 2023 marks the largest change in the server since its inception; departing from its traditional mixed survival-roleplay and creative structure. Ultimately, it was to convert the server to attract a more generic audience, in light of competition from other games such as Roblox for the server's niche transit enthusiast player base.


== 2022: Shift to a creative-focused server ==
== 2022: Shift to a creative-focused server ==
Line 944: Line 1,075:


=== New Survival World, Avalon, launched (soon) ===
=== New Survival World, Avalon, launched (soon) ===
=== Removal of manual metro lines ===
==== Gradual phasing out of drivers in tandem with the closure of 4H ====
First announced as part of the [[Vision 2023]] program, the retirement of manual metro lines was confirmed by [[SilverWolv|President SilverWolv]] on May 1st 2022.
He stated that when the transition to [[New Wolfminster (5th Haven)|FifthHaven]] was officially made, that support for official manually operated metro lines would cease. This meant that operations for [[WolvHaven Metro (4th Haven)|WolvHaven Metro]] [[Metro Line 4 (4th Haven)|Lines 4]], [[Metro Line 5 (4th Haven)|5]], [[Metro Line 6 (4th Haven)|6]] and [[Metro Line 7 (4th Haven)|7]] would be suspended by 2023 and that there would not be any manually operated lines in [[New Wolfminster (5th Haven)|New Wolfminster]].
He explained his decision by stating that support for the manual lines had been getting increasingly difficult with the with the majority of [[Train Driving|train examiners]] being unavailable most of the time, making it hard to match players with examiners who are online at the same time. That a lot of administrative burden was involved in the upkeep of the system including the upkeep of driver records, and necessary custom plugins to tackle cheating in the system by players abusing exploits which were becoming increasingly burdenous on [[Staff]]. He also noted that a disproportionate amount of effort to serve a niche section of the community and that [[Staff]] had noted that the majority of the players who came on to drive trains only came online just to drive trains, and rarely interacted with other aspects of the server, or its community. This linked into his point that the gamemode was unsustainable and that players who came on just to drive metro trains eventually got bored or tired of the system and leave, whereby the only thing that would entice them to return would be an expansion of the system itself which was not sustainable.
==== Relaxation of driving restrictions ====
As promised in May 2022, on October 8th 2022, [[SilverWolv|President SilverWolv]] announced that from October 14th 2022, manual metro lines would be able to be driven by players who do not hold licenses and that players were able to access warps for the depots of these lines in the [[Department of Transport|DOT building]] in La Resistance/Dakota. All past driver blacklists were also waived.
== 2023: FifthHaven launched, increased server activity ==